I defiNETly enjoyed your videe, although I couldn't shake the feeling that I had been slipped speed. In other words, as per usual, you talk WAY too fast. I know you're trying to get all of the information in, but the point is you need to cut down your pitch to only the MOST pertinent information and thus reasonably fit within the time limit.
Also, somehow, even in a video, you stand way too close.
All in all, though, I liked how you tried to prompt me as an investor to care about your research, but I also would've liked for you to explain the intrinsic value it holds in the academic conversation and real world (as that's what you'll need to articulate in your paper).
Anyways, I think that you do a good job of explaining the context behind your research and how it is pertinent to an investor. I also like how you explain how pricing models work to somebody who does not have any investing experience.
However, I think that you spend too much time going into the specifics behind how pricing models and IPOs work. Instead, I think that you should have spent a little more time explaining what the actual gap in your research is and how you intend to develop a pricing model that actually solves this problem. Furthermore, I also would have liked to see you explain your methods some so that I could understand what exactly you intend to do for your research.
I understand that you had a lot that you had to cram into your video, especially since your topic requires more explaining to the average person, and so, with that in mind, I think that you did a good job of fitting most of the information that you needed into the video while also selling the importance of your project. For that, I say good job!
I think Eminem's Rap God was slower than this (just kidding it was about the same speed)
Overall, I think you do a great job conveying the importance of your research to the potential investor and you did a decent job of explaining some basic information (better than that one day in class).
I agree with Brian that you spent a lot of time talking about how IPOs work, but at the same time, I do realize that it is an important part of your paper to convey. I know you have decent methods, but I didn't get any of them in your video, and that's something an investor might want to know (along with the rest of us). I just think you focused a little too much on trying to win an investor, and because of how much information you wanted to convey, you didn't go so much into some of the more fundamental aspects of your project.
Overall, good job. Slow down and back away from the camera next time though ;)
Akash,
ReplyDeleteI defiNETly enjoyed your videe, although I couldn't shake the feeling that I had been slipped speed. In other words, as per usual, you talk WAY too fast. I know you're trying to get all of the information in, but the point is you need to cut down your pitch to only the MOST pertinent information and thus reasonably fit within the time limit.
Also, somehow, even in a video, you stand way too close.
All in all, though, I liked how you tried to prompt me as an investor to care about your research, but I also would've liked for you to explain the intrinsic value it holds in the academic conversation and real world (as that's what you'll need to articulate in your paper).
Bro, you're not Busta Rhymes, slow down...
ReplyDeleteAnyways, I think that you do a good job of explaining the context behind your research and how it is pertinent to an investor. I also like how you explain how pricing models work to somebody who does not have any investing experience.
However, I think that you spend too much time going into the specifics behind how pricing models and IPOs work. Instead, I think that you should have spent a little more time explaining what the actual gap in your research is and how you intend to develop a pricing model that actually solves this problem. Furthermore, I also would have liked to see you explain your methods some so that I could understand what exactly you intend to do for your research.
I understand that you had a lot that you had to cram into your video, especially since your topic requires more explaining to the average person, and so, with that in mind, I think that you did a good job of fitting most of the information that you needed into the video while also selling the importance of your project. For that, I say good job!
I think Eminem's Rap God was slower than this (just kidding it was about the same speed)
ReplyDeleteOverall, I think you do a great job conveying the importance of your research to the potential investor and you did a decent job of explaining some basic information (better than that one day in class).
I agree with Brian that you spent a lot of time talking about how IPOs work, but at the same time, I do realize that it is an important part of your paper to convey. I know you have decent methods, but I didn't get any of them in your video, and that's something an investor might want to know (along with the rest of us). I just think you focused a little too much on trying to win an investor, and because of how much information you wanted to convey, you didn't go so much into some of the more fundamental aspects of your project.
Overall, good job. Slow down and back away from the camera next time though ;)